<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721</id><updated>2012-01-01T13:40:27.870-05:00</updated><category term='I'/><title type='text'>Another Blog ... Sorry</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>369</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6164534028202666138</id><published>2012-01-01T10:10:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-01T13:40:27.882-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Ignoring the Publicity Seekers: A New Year's Resolution We Should All Make</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]While you sometimes have to convince skeptics that politics matter, it's even harder to get people to see that the decisions the media make when it comes to pop culture are important. But they are. We live in a time in which celebrity is not only something that often comes without being earned by any </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6164534028202666138'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6164534028202666138'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2012/01/ignoring-publicity-seekers-new-years.html' title='Ignoring the Publicity Seekers: A New Year&apos;s Resolution We Should All Make'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2282142832419762798</id><published>2011-11-13T16:16:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2011-11-13T19:45:00.760-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Why I Support the Walker Recall, Even as I Have Concerns About Recalls</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]The minute the clock strikes midnight Monday night, signifying that November 14 has turned into November 15, the effort to recall Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin will begin.The organizers of the Walker recall have some wind at their backs. They were able to recall two GOP state senators in August. And </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2282142832419762798'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2282142832419762798'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/11/why-i-support-walker-recall-even-as-i.html' title='Why I Support the Walker Recall, Even as I Have Concerns About Recalls'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-8587150199993970632</id><published>2011-10-25T21:48:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2011-10-26T00:14:29.578-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Income Inequality Is the Achilles Heel in the GOP Strategy to Demonize Occupy Wall Street</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]"I don't care about that."That is what Rick Perry said in the New York Times when John Harwood told him his tax plan would increase income inequality. Give Perry credit for his honesty. After all, he just articulated out loud what is the accepted dogma of the modern Tea Party-owned Republican party, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8587150199993970632'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8587150199993970632'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/10/income-inequality-is-achilles-heel-in.html' title='Income Inequality Is the Achilles Heel in the GOP Strategy to Demonize Occupy Wall Street'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-5553185818718492083</id><published>2011-09-21T20:31:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2011-09-22T00:06:37.424-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I Hope Obama's Veto Threat Is the Start of a New Effort to Fight Back Against the GOP</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]When I read that Jerry Brown was "bewildered and stunned" at how ideological and uncompromising the GOP had become in California, I was surprised and dismayed, all at the same time.I was surprised because I had to wonder if the governor had been paying attention to national politics. I've discussed how </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5553185818718492083'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5553185818718492083'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/09/i-hope-obamas-veto-threat-is-start-of.html' title='I Hope Obama&apos;s Veto Threat Is the Start of a New Effort to Fight Back Against the GOP'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-3294604213099585059</id><published>2011-07-31T17:46:00.007-04:00</published><updated>2011-07-31T20:13:20.165-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Debt Ceiling "Compromise" Is a Total Democratic Capitulation to the GOP</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Imagine this scenario: You're pro-choice and you attend a debate between two candidates for office on the issue of a constitutional amendment to criminalize abortion. The first candidate argues that abortion is murder, and if a doctor performs an abortion on a woman, both of them should be charged with </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3294604213099585059'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3294604213099585059'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/07/debt-ceiling-compromise-is-total.html' title='The Debt Ceiling &quot;Compromise&quot; Is a Total Democratic Capitulation to the GOP'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7258608669300493783</id><published>2011-07-24T13:40:00.011-04:00</published><updated>2011-07-24T15:49:49.121-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Lesson from the Debt Ceiling Negotiations: The GOP Is Now Run by Far Right Ideologues</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]If one message has emerged from the negotiations to raise the debt ceiling, I think it's this: The Republican Party, at least in the House of Representatives, has been captured by far-right ideologues who are either ignorant of, or indifferent to, the practical effect of their insistence on ideological </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7258608669300493783'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7258608669300493783'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/07/lesson-from-debt-ceiling-negotiations.html' title='Lesson from the Debt Ceiling Negotiations: The GOP Is Now Run by Far Right Ideologues'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7953151508368193443</id><published>2011-07-06T10:13:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2011-07-06T12:20:38.607-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Brooks Is Right: Democrats Have Caved to the GOP in Debt Ceiling Negotiations</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]David Brooks's New York Times column on Monday created quite a stir, getting major play on cable television news and online (at least between Casey Anthony reports).Most of the discussion turned on Brooks' assertion that "the Republican Party may no longer be a normal party. Over the past few  years, it </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7953151508368193443'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7953151508368193443'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/07/brooks-is-right-democrats-have-caved-to.html' title='Brooks Is Right: Democrats Have Caved to the GOP in Debt Ceiling Negotiations'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-665785025710133134</id><published>2011-07-02T11:39:00.007-04:00</published><updated>2011-07-04T10:23:11.653-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Independence Day, the Declaration of Independence and Understanding American History</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]When Tea Party darling Herman Cain announced his candidacy for president in May, he decided to cite words from the U.S. Constitution to underline his key points. Unfortunately for Cain, he got his documents wrong. The passage he chose was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.Cain is</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/665785025710133134'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/665785025710133134'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/07/independence-day-declaration-of.html' title='Independence Day, the Declaration of Independence and Understanding American History'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-8490683269482581462</id><published>2011-06-12T18:57:00.008-04:00</published><updated>2011-06-12T22:34:46.482-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Weiner's Hubris Means There Is One Fewer Democrat to Fight Bad GOP Policies</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]I was speaking to a friend of mine who lives in Anthony Weiner's district, and we both had the same reaction to the congressman's Twitter scandal. Oddly, though, the element of Weinergate we both zeroed in on has been largely unrepresented in the news media's coverage.Specifically, we were upset that one</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8490683269482581462'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8490683269482581462'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/06/weiners-hubris-means-there-is-one-fewer.html' title='Weiner&apos;s Hubris Means There Is One Fewer Democrat to Fight Bad GOP Policies'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6292434359128397631</id><published>2011-05-23T09:30:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2011-05-23T10:37:06.503-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The GOP Has Gone from the Party of No to the Party of F You</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]When Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels announced he would not seek the Republican nomination for president in 2012 (a week after Mike Huckabee also chose not to run), he said it was because of the "interests and wishes" of his family.And while I have no reason to doubt Daniels's claim, I can't help think </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6292434359128397631'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6292434359128397631'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/05/gop-has-gone-from-party-of-no-to-party.html' title='The GOP Has Gone from the Party of No to the Party of F You'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7191869073839084994</id><published>2011-05-07T16:46:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2011-05-07T21:09:40.351-04:00</updated><title type='text'>It's Been a Bad Week for GOP Lies About Obama</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]A study came out this week demonstrating, not surprisingly, that pundits and politicians tend to be consistently wrong with their predictions.  (As an aside, I was not surprised but quite happy to see that Paul  Krugman was rated as the most accurate prognosticator, with former  Pennsylvania </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7191869073839084994'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7191869073839084994'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/05/its-been-bad-week-for-gop-lies-about.html' title='It&apos;s Been a Bad Week for GOP Lies About Obama'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7198532556907071332</id><published>2011-04-07T21:15:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2011-04-07T22:51:01.685-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Democrats Have to Stand Up to the GOP's Budget Proposals, Even If It Means a Government Shutdown</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]As I write this, we are hours away from a government shutdown, as, for the time being, the Democrats and the president have failed to cave in to the far-right, potentially catastrophic budget demands of the Tea Party-owned Republicans on Capitol Hill. (And if you think I'm being unfair in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7198532556907071332'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7198532556907071332'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/04/democrats-have-to-stand-up-to-gops.html' title='Democrats Have to Stand Up to the GOP&apos;s Budget Proposals, Even If It Means a Government Shutdown'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2062124805005288173</id><published>2011-03-25T10:13:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2011-03-25T11:50:18.903-04:00</updated><title type='text'>GOP Buyer's Remorse Is Nice, but It Only Matters If It Leads to Votes</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]There seems to be a growing tide of GOP buyer's remorse sweeping the country.Republicans campaigned in 2010 on creating jobs and cutting spending and the deficit. But once in power, both in the U.S. House of Representatives and in numerous states, all those promises went out the window. Instead</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2062124805005288173'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2062124805005288173'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/03/gop-buyers-remorse-is-nice-but-it-only.html' title='GOP Buyer&apos;s Remorse Is Nice, but It Only Matters If It Leads to Votes'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-457149909858079144</id><published>2011-03-03T18:11:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2011-03-03T19:36:51.118-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Wisconsin is Front Line of GOP War on Democrats, So Where Are the National Democrats?</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]I wrote two weeks ago about how Gov. Scott Walker's so-called budget repair bill was part of a larger Republican war on the working class. And the events of the last two weeks have backed that up.Walker's proposed budget, released yesterday, cuts taxes for the wealthy while drastically reducing</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/457149909858079144'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/457149909858079144'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/03/wisconsin-is-front-line-of-gop-war-on.html' title='Wisconsin is Front Line of GOP War on Democrats, So Where Are the National Democrats?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-8089207064149842774</id><published>2011-02-18T10:25:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2011-02-18T11:51:01.370-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Wisconsin Protests Are a Battle in a Larger GOP War on Working Americans</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]As I made the 10-minute walk up W. Johnson Street from the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus toward the Capitol on Tuesday, it never occurred to me that anyone outside of the state would know or care what was going on.I was headed to participate in a rally in opposition to new Republican </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8089207064149842774'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8089207064149842774'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/02/wisconsin-protests-are-battle-in-larger.html' title='The Wisconsin Protests Are a Battle in a Larger GOP War on Working Americans'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-5166775416438786253</id><published>2011-01-25T23:16:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2011-01-26T00:41:52.267-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Paul Ryan's Fiction-Filled SOTU Response: Will America Buy It?</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]Rep. Paul Ryan's Republican response to President Obama's State of the Union address was, in my humble opinion, a low moment for our democracy.Ryan is not the first Republican to be less than honest about an issue (in this case President Obama's handling of the federal budget deficit) to push </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5166775416438786253'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5166775416438786253'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/01/paul-ryans-fiction-filled-sotu-response.html' title='Paul Ryan&apos;s Fiction-Filled SOTU Response: Will America Buy It?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-8533401662999258872</id><published>2011-01-23T11:55:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2011-01-23T14:03:05.514-05:00</updated><title type='text'>A Tribute to Olbermann: Why He Is Different from the Pundits at Fox News</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]Black and white is easy; nuance is hard. Which is why it's much easier to just lump media outlets and personalities into simple boxes: left v. right, or partisan v. objective, for example.So if you want to play that game, it's easy to dismiss Keith Olbermann, who broadcast his final episode of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8533401662999258872'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8533401662999258872'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/01/tribute-to-olbermann-why-he-is.html' title='A Tribute to Olbermann: Why He Is Different from the Pundits at Fox News'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6477669703552231817</id><published>2011-01-14T13:59:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2011-01-14T22:01:03.316-05:00</updated><title type='text'>There Can Be No Gun Control Without Recognizing and Respecting the Different Gun Cultures in the U.S.</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]The tragic massacre in Arizona has pushed the issue of gun regulation, which had seemingly disappeared off the national radar, back into the spotlight.There have been essentially two types of responses to the shooting. Many, like Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6477669703552231817'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6477669703552231817'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/01/there-can-be-no-gun-control-without.html' title='There Can Be No Gun Control Without Recognizing and Respecting the Different Gun Cultures in the U.S.'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-8383683625501220664</id><published>2011-01-13T14:01:00.008-05:00</published><updated>2011-01-13T17:33:47.592-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Right Wing Media Lies and the Arizona Tragedy</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]In the days since the massacre in Arizona, the mainstream political media (and much online discussion) have zeroed in on one question: Did the uncivil political discourse (with violent imagery) of the Glenn Becks, Rush Limbaughs and Sarah Palins of the world create an environment that </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8383683625501220664'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8383683625501220664'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2011/01/right-wing-media-lies-and-arizona.html' title='Right Wing Media Lies and the Arizona Tragedy'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1650785442227044450</id><published>2010-12-19T12:49:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2010-12-19T13:50:44.488-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Glad to See DADT Gone, But the Underlying Bigotry Remains</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]Don't Ask, Don't Tell has been repealed (once President Obama signs the bill). Finally. We are a better, stronger, safer country than we were before the vote. But let's not break our arms patting ourselves on the back.Why am I so grumpy? No, it's not because I'm Scrooge. (By the way, Happy </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1650785442227044450'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1650785442227044450'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/12/glad-to-see-dadt-gone-but-underlying.html' title='Glad to See DADT Gone, But the Underlying Bigotry Remains'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1313709877529060571</id><published>2010-11-26T14:32:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2010-11-27T11:01:44.491-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Sarah Palin's North Korea Flub Matters</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]Sarah Palin provided prime material for news outlets and comedy programs when she said on Glenn Beck's radio show Wednesday:"But obviously, we've got to stand with our North Korean allies."If she hasn't already, I'm sure Palin will say that the "elitist," "lamestream" media is doing her wrong, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1313709877529060571'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1313709877529060571'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/11/why-sarah-palins-north-korea-flub.html' title='Why Sarah Palin&apos;s North Korea Flub Matters'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7725043808869229574</id><published>2010-11-02T23:50:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-11-03T00:54:00.646-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Three Good Things for Progressives to Take from the Midterm Election Results</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]It's been apparent for some time that Election Day 2010 would not be a good one for the Democrats. Midterm elections generally don't go well for the president's party, and when you throw in high unemployment and a sputtering economy, it becomes an especially tough hill to climb.So I had no </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7725043808869229574'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7725043808869229574'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/11/three-good-things-for-progressives-to.html' title='Three Good Things for Progressives to Take from the Midterm Election Results'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-3678539343446074294</id><published>2010-10-29T09:29:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2010-10-29T11:06:44.152-04:00</updated><title type='text'>A Short and Clear Guide to What a Midterm Vote Really Means</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]It seems that Tea Party-dominated Republicans are going to make gains in the midterm elections on Tuesday. Prognosticators from Nate Silver to the Huffington Post are forecasting the likelihood of a GOP takeover of the House and a very closely divided Senate.The president's party traditionally </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3678539343446074294'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3678539343446074294'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/10/short-and-clear-guide-to-what-midterm.html' title='A Short and Clear Guide to What a Midterm Vote Really Means'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-4915453242834398430</id><published>2010-10-10T22:49:00.021-04:00</published><updated>2010-10-11T02:02:50.417-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Tea Party All-Stars: The Worst of Extreme GOP Midterm Candidates</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]Noted football coach Bill Parcells once said, "You are what your record says you are."Parcells'  quote jumped into my mind when I was thinking about the slate of Tea  Party-influenced Republicans running in November. I feel like we've  become immune to the stories about the extreme and, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4915453242834398430'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4915453242834398430'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/10/tea-party-all-stars-worst-of-extreme.html' title='The Tea Party All-Stars: The Worst of Extreme GOP Midterm Candidates'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-5130852997943706705</id><published>2010-09-14T23:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-09-15T01:45:41.486-04:00</updated><title type='text'>What Does a Vote for a GOP Candidate in November Really Mean?</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]With the primaries now complete (and Republican voters in Delaware giving the Democrats a huge gift by nominating the East Coast version of Sharron Angle over the popular--and probably unbeatable--Mike Castle), the races are set for the midterm elections in November. With many forecasters </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5130852997943706705'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5130852997943706705'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/09/what-does-vote-for-gop-candidate-in.html' title='What Does a Vote for a GOP Candidate in November Really Mean?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6746723604567466863</id><published>2010-08-31T18:09:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2010-08-31T19:49:53.321-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Is the GOP Looking Out for You?</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]With the midterms just over two months away, we are inundated with daily media reports on the election, most of them predicting doom for the Democrats. But what jumps out at me is how telling so many of the proposals and actions from Republican officeholders and candidates are, since they </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6746723604567466863'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6746723604567466863'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/08/is-gop-looking-out-for-you.html' title='Is the GOP Looking Out for You?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1379448857812681414</id><published>2010-08-16T17:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-08-16T18:55:48.499-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Proposed Lower Manhattan Islamic Center Deserves Nuanced Discussion, Not GOP Fear Mongering</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]Given how far to the right the mainstream of the conservative movement has moved in the last few years, it is not often that I read a piece from a right-leaning columnists that actually adds to the national discussion of an issue. Which is why I was pleasantly surprised by Ross Douthat's column</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1379448857812681414'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1379448857812681414'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/08/proposed-lower-manhattan-islamic-center.html' title='The Proposed Lower Manhattan Islamic Center Deserves Nuanced Discussion, Not GOP Fear Mongering'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6009789561295997264</id><published>2010-08-08T11:43:00.007-04:00</published><updated>2010-08-08T13:51:43.956-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Krugman's Takedown of Ryan Demonstrates How Conservatives Are at War with the Middle Class</title><summary type='text'>[I was asked to contribute a piece to Huffington Post on the decline of the middle class. This is what I came up with. It can also be accessed via my Huffington Post author page.]Conservatives routinely paint Barack Obama as a socialist looking to redistribute wealth in the United States. (Or worse, as Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.) reported that tea party leaders, during a meeting, espoused paranoid </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6009789561295997264'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6009789561295997264'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/08/krugmans-takedown-of-ryan-demonstrates.html' title='Krugman&apos;s Takedown of Ryan Demonstrates How Conservatives Are at War with the Middle Class'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2486905536817861265</id><published>2010-07-26T21:10:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-07-26T22:11:16.564-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Is WikiLeaks' Release of the War Logs Afghanistan's Cronkite Moment?</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]In light of this week's bombshell revelations about the course of the war in Afghanistan, I read an interesting commentary that grabbed my attention:"To say that we are closer to victory today is to believe, in the face of the evidence, the optimists who have been wrong in the past.  To suggest</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2486905536817861265'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2486905536817861265'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/07/is-wikileaks-release-of-war-logs.html' title='Is WikiLeaks&apos; Release of the War Logs Afghanistan&apos;s Cronkite Moment?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-3573469656032004876</id><published>2010-07-16T10:15:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-07-16T10:24:33.037-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Financial Regulation Vote Shows that While Americans Should Be Angry, the GOP Is not the Solution</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from           my author page here.]As the partisan cable networks breathlessly discuss what will happen in the midterm elections in November, there is much talk about how Americans are angry and, as a result, the Republicans are set for major gains in Congress. But the connection between these two assertions--Americans' </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3573469656032004876'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3573469656032004876'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/07/americans-have-right-to-be-angry-but.html' title='The Financial Regulation Vote Shows that While Americans Should Be Angry, the GOP Is not the Solution'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1616732810309668167</id><published>2010-06-28T11:34:00.010-04:00</published><updated>2010-06-28T17:07:26.646-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Reagan Was Wrong: The Nine Most Terrifying Words Are, "I'm a Libertarian and the Market Will Save You"</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from          my author page here.]I was tailgating with my wife and two friends in the parking lot of Miller Park before a Brewers game yesterday, when a guy with a pasted-on, plastic, local-news-anchor smile approached our group. He wanted us to sign a petition to get his "buddy" on the ballot for state treasurer. Of course, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1616732810309668167'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1616732810309668167'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/06/reagan-was-wrong-nine-most-terrifying.html' title='Reagan Was Wrong: The Nine Most Terrifying Words Are, &quot;I&apos;m a Libertarian and the Market Will Save You&quot;'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2201422608021794410</id><published>2010-06-10T14:07:00.007-04:00</published><updated>2010-06-10T15:50:32.064-04:00</updated><title type='text'>GOP Leaders Play Games While Oil Pours into the Gulf</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from         my author page here.]Nero, it is said, fiddled while Rome burned. When they write about the early 21st century United States, maybe they'll say Americans blustered as oil ravaged the Gulf.As a country, we seem to have lost the plot, with grandstanding, strategizing and even lying taking center stage while real </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2201422608021794410'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2201422608021794410'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/06/political-leaders-play-games-while-oil.html' title='GOP Leaders Play Games While Oil Pours into the Gulf'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-3820713667081048699</id><published>2010-05-28T10:50:00.009-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-28T12:16:29.888-04:00</updated><title type='text'>GOP Hypocrisy Has Been Exposed by the BP Oil Disaster</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from        my author page here.]As I read about President Obama's press conference yesterday addressing the government's plans for the cleanup of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, I was reminded of two of the major ills affecting our modern democracy.The first has to do with the political blame game. For the 16 months, the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3820713667081048699'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3820713667081048699'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/05/gop-hypocrisy-has-been-exposed-by-bp.html' title='GOP Hypocrisy Has Been Exposed by the BP Oil Disaster'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-5741178741997423830</id><published>2010-05-03T22:38:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-03T23:53:16.967-04:00</updated><title type='text'>It Seems Fitting that as Palin Lies Again, ABC News Cuts a Quarter of Its Staff</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from       my author page here.]While the attempted SUV bombing in Times Square was the big news this weekend (rightfully so), two smaller stories, taken together, highlight another risk to our democracy.On Sunday, Geoffrey Dunn discussed on HuffPo the latest lie to come from the Sarah Palin camp, as she claimed her ethics issues</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5741178741997423830'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5741178741997423830'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/05/it-seems-fitting-that-as-palin-lies.html' title='It Seems Fitting that as Palin Lies Again, ABC News Cuts a Quarter of Its Staff'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7358050265200741012</id><published>2010-04-10T18:06:00.012-04:00</published><updated>2010-04-10T19:45:55.392-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Five Factors I Hope the President Considers When Choosing the New Supreme Court Justice</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from      my author page here.]The highlight of my three years in law school occurred on an elevator. Sounds odd, but it's true. During my second year, I spent 10 seconds traveling up one floor with the then just-retired Supreme Court justice William Brennan (he was teaching a seminar for third-year students).It wasn't anything </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7358050265200741012'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7358050265200741012'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/04/five-factors-i-hope-president-considers.html' title='The Five Factors I Hope the President Considers When Choosing the New Supreme Court Justice'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-3748104009150231101</id><published>2010-03-20T12:06:00.010-04:00</published><updated>2010-03-20T13:28:08.061-04:00</updated><title type='text'>A Guide for Those Traumatized by Right-Wing, Fear-Mongering Lies on Health Care Refortm</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from     my author page here.]With a historic vote on health care reform set for tomorrow, this is how far the right has stooped: Rep. Paul Broun of Georgia said on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives:"If ObamaCare passes, that free insurance card that's in people's pockets  is gonna be as worthless as a Confederate </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3748104009150231101'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3748104009150231101'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/03/guide-for-those-traumatized-by-right.html' title='A Guide for Those Traumatized by Right-Wing, Fear-Mongering Lies on Health Care Refortm'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-281165711389376224</id><published>2010-03-12T11:58:00.023-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-12T13:36:43.597-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Fearful and Scheming Republicans Are Playing into al-Qaida's Strategy</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from    my author page here.]You might have missed an AP article on al-Qaida that slipped nearly unnoticed through yesterday's news cycle. The piece reports that the terrorist operation is moving towards smaller-scale attacks like the Christmas Day attempted bombing of a flight to Detroit. Why? For a reason the Republicans will </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/281165711389376224'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/281165711389376224'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/03/fearful-republicans-are-helping-al.html' title='Fearful and Scheming Republicans Are Playing into al-Qaida&apos;s Strategy'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-186976652104851628</id><published>2010-03-03T10:30:00.010-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-03T10:50:18.709-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Attention Democrats: The House Is on Fire, But the Solution is to Grab a Hose, Not Cower in the Corner</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from   my author page here.]I have been known in some circles for my lousy analogies, so I'm going to bust one out now. I have a message for the president and the Democrats in congress: The house is on fire. So the question is: What are you going to do? Here's a hint: If you stay in the house, you will burn to death.Let's take a </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/186976652104851628'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/186976652104851628'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/03/attention-democrats-house-on-fire-but.html' title='Attention Democrats: The House Is on Fire, But the Solution is to Grab a Hose, Not Cower in the Corner'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-4720747295855959112</id><published>2010-01-26T11:35:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-26T12:51:41.681-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='I'/><title type='text'>An Open Letter to the President: It's Time for Change, Not Spending Freezes</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from  my author page here.]Dear President Obama:I know you are a very smart guy. After all, not only have you graduated from Ivy League universities like Columbia and Harvard, and taught a heady subject like constitutional law at one of the top law schools in the country, but you have had real-world success, reaching the highest </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4720747295855959112'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4720747295855959112'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/01/open-letter-to-president-its-time-for.html' title='An Open Letter to the President: It&apos;s Time for Change, Not Spending Freezes'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6607125226855191391</id><published>2010-01-23T13:05:00.019-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-23T16:56:37.814-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Citizens United Reveals the Danger of Our Right Wing Supreme Court</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Shortly after George W. Bush was re-elected in 2004, a friend of mine said, "Well, at least we'll be rid of him forever in four years." My response was, "I wish." Although it's a tiny part of any presidential campaign, presidents leave a lasting impression on the future of America through their </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6607125226855191391'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6607125226855191391'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/01/citizen-united-reveals-danger-of-our.html' title='Citizens United Reveals the Danger of Our Right Wing Supreme Court'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1530891066422391590</id><published>2010-01-19T21:35:00.009-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-19T22:31:38.393-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Democracy Worked in Massachusetts, Now We Have to Live with the Consequences</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Democracy worked tonight in Massachusetts.The citizens of the Bay State, in which Democrats outnumber Republicans three-to-one, which doesn't have a single Republican in its U.S. House delegation, and whose citizens just 14 months ago voted for Barack Obama by a margin of 62 percent to 38 percent, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1530891066422391590'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1530891066422391590'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/01/democracy-worked-in-massachusetts-now.html' title='Democracy Worked in Massachusetts, Now We Have to Live with the Consequences'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7392681346002715069</id><published>2010-01-14T14:28:00.014-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-15T15:50:08.635-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Three Pleasant Surprises in the First Half of the TV Season</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Publications and websites are filled with previews of the bevy of new prime-time television shows to be launched over the next month. While I have a few I'm looking forward to checking out (The Deep End looks fun, and, as a Gilmore Girls fan, I'll have to give Life Unexpected a try, although I expect to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7392681346002715069'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7392681346002715069'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/01/three-pleasant-surprises-in-first-half.html' title='Three Pleasant Surprises in the First Half of the TV Season'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-8939548076011809037</id><published>2010-01-11T13:11:00.009-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-11T14:25:38.122-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Equating Reid and Lott Is Flat-Out Wrong and Just the Latest Republican Game</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Republicans are out in force calling for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's resignation over remarks he made in 2008 about Barack Obama. The argument goes that Trent Lott had to step down as majority leader after making a race-related comment in 2002, so what's good for the Republican is good for the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8939548076011809037'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8939548076011809037'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/01/equating-reid-and-lott-is-flat-out_11.html' title='Equating Reid and Lott Is Flat-Out Wrong and Just the Latest Republican Game'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6664808754612369835</id><published>2010-01-10T18:37:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-10T20:07:18.510-05:00</updated><title type='text'>NBC Botches the Leno-O'Brien Affair, But the Real Story is the Demise of Network Television</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Yes, I know. I have regularly criticized NBC in this space, so much so that I wrote a column promising to be nicer to the downtrodden network. So it is not surprising that I would now come out of my grad-school-imposed temporary sabbatical to rip NBC over the Conan O'Brien-Jay Leno debacle. But, really, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6664808754612369835'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6664808754612369835'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/01/nbc-botches-leno-obrien-affair-but-real.html' title='NBC Botches the Leno-O&apos;Brien Affair, But the Real Story is the Demise of Network Television'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7478200752637622816</id><published>2010-01-05T14:32:00.016-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-05T15:48:51.302-05:00</updated><title type='text'>After the Underwear Bomber, Republicans Have Shown Their True Color: Weakness</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Remember when Republicans portrayed themselves as tough guys? The party of John Wayne? Hard to picture now, right? Ever since an Islamic fundamentalist tried to blow up a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit, Republicans have, as Steve Benen eloquently put it, engaged in a "collective display of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7478200752637622816'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7478200752637622816'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2010/01/republicans-have-been-weak-on-terror.html' title='After the Underwear Bomber, Republicans Have Shown Their True Color: Weakness'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-67762595275670601</id><published>2009-12-28T12:42:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-28T14:16:01.896-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Republicans' Disdain for the American People Should Be the Story of 2009</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Looking back on 2009, much of the discussion on TV news shows is whether President Obama and the Democrats in Congress correctly handled the problems facing the country. Somehow, a narrative seems to have emerged that the Democrats failed and would pay the price in the 2010 midterm elections.But where is</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/67762595275670601'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/67762595275670601'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/12/republican-misconduct-should-be-story.html' title='The Republicans&apos; Disdain for the American People Should Be the Story of 2009'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-3307151223206549423</id><published>2009-12-23T10:50:00.010-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-23T13:04:39.210-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Political Labels 101: A Lesson for Republicans and Tea Baggers</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]I am a big believer in open political debate. While my views may be solidly progressive, I have the utmost respect for anyone interested in making honest arguments as to how to proceed on the issues of the day. I admire Jurgen Habermas's view of democracy requiring a public sphere in which citizens come </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3307151223206549423'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3307151223206549423'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/12/political-labels-101-lesson-for.html' title='Political Labels 101: A Lesson for Republicans and Tea Baggers'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-427277076435724330</id><published>2009-12-10T17:29:00.015-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-10T19:03:13.937-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Three Reasons to Be Happy About the Reported Deal by Senate Democrats on Health Care</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]According to reports yesterday, a group of 10 Democratic senators, five centrists and five progressives, has reached a deal to allow health care reform legislation to proceed. We don't know much about the compromise yet, as the senators aren't talking about it pending receiving cost estimates from the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/427277076435724330'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/427277076435724330'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/12/three-reasons-to-be-happy-about.html' title='Three Reasons to Be Happy About the Reported Deal by Senate Democrats on Health Care'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7096871330552171951</id><published>2009-12-03T18:12:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-03T20:29:02.770-05:00</updated><title type='text'>I'm Not in a New York State of Mind, Thanks to 38 State Senators</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]But now I need a little give and take/The New York Times, The Daily News/It comes down to reality And it's fine with me 'cause I've let it slide/Don't care if it's Chinatown or on Riverside/I don't have any reasons I've left them all behind/I'm in a New York state of mind- Billy Joel, "New York State of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7096871330552171951'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7096871330552171951'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/12/im-not-in-new-york-state-of-mind-thanks.html' title='I&apos;m Not in a New York State of Mind, Thanks to 38 State Senators'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-9167522870838770826</id><published>2009-11-20T18:31:00.013-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-21T22:47:27.786-05:00</updated><title type='text'>It's Too Early to Celebrate the Senate Health Care Vote</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]I swear, I find no no joy in being Debbie Downer. I really wish I could celebrate the Senate's 60-39 vote to begin the debate on health care legislation, narrowly holding off the blocking tactic of the Republicans.  I am 100 percent in favor of health care reform (I'm a fan of Rep. Anthony Weiner's </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/9167522870838770826'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/9167522870838770826'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/11/its-too-early-to-celebrate-seante.html' title='It&apos;s Too Early to Celebrate the Senate Health Care Vote'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-553054350150587470</id><published>2009-11-03T19:07:00.020-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-03T20:15:40.854-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Candidate Obama Might Have Some Questions for President Obama</title><summary type='text'>[I was invited by the editors of HuffingtonPost.com to write a reaction to Arianna Huffington's article comparing President Obama to Candidate Obama, after she read David Plouffe's new book. This is what I came up with. You can access it from my author page here.]As Barack Obama stood in Grant Park a year ago tonight and gave his victory speech, it was a galvanizing moment, one I (and millions of</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/553054350150587470'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/553054350150587470'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/11/candidate-obama-might-have-some.html' title='Candidate Obama Might Have Some Questions for President Obama'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6075833307547708598</id><published>2009-10-22T15:46:00.007-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-22T16:48:38.273-04:00</updated><title type='text'>We Should Be Grateful that Obama is "Dithering"</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Former Vice President Dick Cheney accused President Barack Obama on Wednesday of "dithering" on Afghanistan. I found this equally amusing and outrageous.You see, we, as a country, would be a lot (and I mean a lot) better off right now if Cheney and his boss had done some dithering before invading Iraq. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6075833307547708598'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6075833307547708598'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/10/we-should-be-grateful-that-obama-is.html' title='We Should Be Grateful that Obama is &quot;Dithering&quot;'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-5453026105329752543</id><published>2009-09-30T14:01:00.007-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-30T15:00:06.016-04:00</updated><title type='text'>With "FlashForward," ABC Offers a Successor to "Lost" ... Kind of</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]There has been a lot of talk that "FlashForward" (ABC, Thursdays at 8:00 p.m. Eastern) is meant to be the network's successor to "Lost," what with the trippy sci-fi premise and Dominic Monaghan soon joining the cast. After watching the debut episode, which aired last week, I can't say I see the fit. But "</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5453026105329752543'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5453026105329752543'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/09/with-flashforward-abc-offers-successor.html' title='With &quot;FlashForward,&quot; ABC Offers a Successor to &quot;Lost&quot; ... Kind of'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6215910605951506487</id><published>2009-09-24T15:40:00.012-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-25T17:34:20.018-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Cougar Town" and "Accidentally on Purpose": More than Just Women with Younger Guys</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Sitcom veterans Courteney Cox and Jenna Elfman are back on prime time network television, and based on how their characters are conducting their love lives, Chandler and Greg would be shocked. Beyond the older woman-younger guy themes, though, "Cougar Town" (ABC, Wednesdays at 9:30 p.m. Eastern) and "</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6215910605951506487'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6215910605951506487'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/09/is-this-season-for-older-women-with.html' title='&quot;Cougar Town&quot; and &quot;Accidentally on Purpose&quot;: More than Just Women with Younger Guys'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2114649054526201762</id><published>2009-09-20T21:01:00.012-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-20T23:04:05.261-04:00</updated><title type='text'>NBC Makes History with "The Tonight ...", er, I Mean  "The Jay Leno Show" in Prime Time</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]If you tuned into the premiere episode of "The Jay Leno Show" on Monday (NBC, Mondays through Fridays, 10:00 p.m. Eastern), you might not have realized that you were witnessing a seminal moment in television history.No, I don't mean the show itself. Despite a lot of claims to the contrary, "The Jay Leno </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2114649054526201762'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2114649054526201762'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/09/nbc-makes-history-with-move-of-tonight.html' title='NBC Makes History with &quot;The Tonight ...&quot;, er, I Mean  &quot;The Jay Leno Show&quot; in Prime Time'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-9010312220703077877</id><published>2009-09-16T16:47:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-16T18:36:01.781-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Baucus Health Care Bill Debacle Reminds Us that Democrats Have to Forget About Trying to Woo Republican Lawmakers</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]When it comes to policy positions, I certainly agree with the Democrats far more than the Republicans. (Do the Republicans still have policy positions? Does really, really hating the president, making decisions based primarily on hurting the president politically instead of what is good for the American </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/9010312220703077877'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/9010312220703077877'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/09/baucus-health-care-bill-debacle-reminds.html' title='The Baucus Health Care Bill Debacle Reminds Us that Democrats Have to Forget About Trying to Woo Republican Lawmakers'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-4087499842192065089</id><published>2009-09-11T22:38:00.015-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-12T09:26:32.728-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I See No Reason to Visit the New "Melrose Place" Again</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]After the CW found some success with "90210" last season, was there ever a doubt that a reboot of "Melrose Place" was soon to follow? Sure enough, a new version of the 1990s nighttime soap made its debut on Tuesday night (9:00 p.m. Eastern).For me, there are two competing thoughts behind reviving "Melrose</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4087499842192065089'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4087499842192065089'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/09/i-see-no-reason-to-visit-new-melrose.html' title='I See No Reason to Visit the New &quot;Melrose Place&quot; Again'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1967439731554946544</id><published>2009-09-07T10:16:00.008-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-07T18:05:56.791-04:00</updated><title type='text'>On Wednesday, the President Has to Move the Health Care Debate from a Marketplace of Lies to a Marketplace of Ideas</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]- John Boehner has a fetish that only allows him to become aroused when he wears 1950s women's housecoats with curlers in his hair.- Rush Limbaugh eats pudding made from the rats that infest his home.- Charles Grassley calls in sick to the Senate once a week to stay home and watch a DVD of "The </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1967439731554946544'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1967439731554946544'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/09/on-wednesday-president-has-to-move.html' title='On Wednesday, the President Has to Move the Health Care Debate from a Marketplace of Lies to a Marketplace of Ideas'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-818480772087161834</id><published>2009-09-05T12:52:00.010-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-05T15:35:52.694-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Mad Men" Is Hitting Its Stride in Its Third Season</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]In my sixth column for WILDsound, back in 2007, I reviewed a new program called "Mad Men."  I reread the article today, after watching the third episode of the show's third season (AMC, Sundays at 10:00 p.m. Eastern), and I was struck by how "Mad Men" has managed to grow into one of the very best shows on</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/818480772087161834'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/818480772087161834'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/09/mad-men-is-hitting-its-stride-in-its.html' title='&quot;Mad Men&quot; Is Hitting Its Stride in Its Third Season'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1758581740202029290</id><published>2009-09-01T09:58:00.016-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-01T11:29:50.914-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Hypocrisy Alert: Cheney Relies on the Objectivity of the Justice Department to Defend Torture</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]I am regularly amazed that public officials can say things in public without experiencing what should be obvious repercussions. The latest example? This doozy from former vice president Dick Cheney regarding his sanctioning of torture (we have prosecuted waterboarding as torture in the past, so Cheney </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1758581740202029290'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1758581740202029290'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/09/hypocrisy-alert-cheney-relies-on.html' title='Hypocrisy Alert: Cheney Relies on the Objectivity of the Justice Department to Defend Torture'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2571460918586733610</id><published>2009-08-03T13:52:00.008-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-03T16:06:11.269-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Looking for a Decent New Summer Show, I Went 0-for-2 with "Ruby &amp; the Rockits" and "Michael &amp; Michael Have Issues"</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Summer is not the easiest time of year to find new shows. With the networks rolling out one inane reality show after another, to find alternatives, you have to open your mind up to possibilities you might not normally consider and take chances. Last week, I was pleasantly surprised by "Dating in the Dark.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2571460918586733610'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2571460918586733610'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/08/note-following-article-will-also-appear.html' title='Looking for a Decent New Summer Show, I Went 0-for-2 with &quot;Ruby &amp; the Rockits&quot; and &quot;Michael &amp; Michael Have Issues&quot;'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7146261312861672107</id><published>2009-07-31T10:33:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-31T10:50:01.245-04:00</updated><title type='text'>When "Yes We Can!" Meets "No We Won't!"</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]I am very concerned about the future of this country.No, not just because health care reform is being so watered down in Congress that it now completely fails to address the underlying dire (and spiraling) problems of the health care system. (As I've written previously, there is no defensible position to</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7146261312861672107'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7146261312861672107'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/07/when-yes-we-can-meets-no-we-wont.html' title='When &quot;Yes We Can!&quot; Meets &quot;No We Won&apos;t!&quot;'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-901517436997746174</id><published>2009-07-24T13:59:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-24T16:37:46.936-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Dating in the Dark" Is Not Your Average Dating Show</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]It all started out so ordinary. As I watched the opening seconds of ABC's new summer reality program "Dating in the Dark" (Mondays at 10 p.m. Eastern), with it's sweeping shots of a mansion surrounded by palm trees, and with the drama-inducing synth music playing in the background, it felt like the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/901517436997746174'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/901517436997746174'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/07/dating-in-dark-is-not-your-average.html' title='&quot;Dating in the Dark&quot; Is Not Your Average Dating Show'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-4478585548268415904</id><published>2009-07-20T13:59:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-20T15:39:10.329-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Congress Is Behaving as if the Health Care System Isn't in Tatters</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]When it comes to health care reform, I feel like the house is on fire, but nobody in Washington (except maybe President Obama) seems to see it. Or worse, they see it, and they don't care.Here are some statistics, via the nonpartisan/bipartisan National Coalition on Health Care (NCHC), to demonstrate just</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4478585548268415904'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4478585548268415904'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/07/we-cant-afford-to-miss-this-opportunity.html' title='Congress Is Behaving as if the Health Care System Isn&apos;t in Tatters'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1602842378155350530</id><published>2009-07-17T13:53:00.012-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-17T15:14:09.623-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Drop Dead Diva" and "Battle of the Bods": Is This Any Way to Treat a Lady?</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Here is the worst-kept secret about television: The networks lure viewers using attractive women. They want actresses men can ogle and women can aspire to look like (how many "Rachel" haircuts popped up in the mid-1990s?). It's like an unspoken deal: The networks promise to cast attractive women in their </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1602842378155350530'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1602842378155350530'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/07/drop-dead-diva-and-battle-of-bods-is.html' title='&quot;Drop Dead Diva&quot; and &quot;Battle of the Bods&quot;: Is This Any Way to Treat a Lady?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-3634756539015175657</id><published>2009-07-11T19:53:00.009-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-11T21:08:52.669-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"10 Things I Hate About You" Is One of the Few New Comedy Options This Summer</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Summer has become synonymous with reality television. An alien landing on earth last week who watched television to learn more about American culture would probably come away thinking we were obsessed with rich teens, people getting hit with padded objects and overweight people dancing. At this point, I </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3634756539015175657'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3634756539015175657'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/07/10-things-i-hate-about-you-is-one-of.html' title='&quot;10 Things I Hate About You&quot; Is One of the Few New Comedy Options This Summer'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-9218545440333723340</id><published>2009-06-27T15:52:00.014-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-27T16:32:42.056-04:00</updated><title type='text'>This Is Not Your Parents' "The Superstars" on ABC, But It's Not Bad, Either</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]The logos on the participants' shirts are the same. As is the name of the show. And there are athletic competitions. After that, I'm pretty much out of similarities between the new version of "The Superstars" (ABC, Tuesdays at 8 p.m. Eastern)  and the original. I'm not saying the new one is bad. It's just</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/9218545440333723340'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/9218545440333723340'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/06/this-is-not-your-parents-superstars-on.html' title='This Is Not Your Parents&apos; &quot;The Superstars&quot; on ABC, But It&apos;s Not Bad, Either'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2061468437681469434</id><published>2009-06-22T09:28:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-22T12:07:40.530-04:00</updated><title type='text'>When It Comes to Health Care, Why Do Republicans (and Some Centrist Democrats) Hate Americans?</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]A couple of weeks ago, in discussing torture, I asked why so many Republicans hate America. Now that the debate over how to fix the heath-care system has moved forward, listening to the Republican position (which is, unfortunately, shared by some centrist Democrats), I can't help but wonder why these </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2061468437681469434'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2061468437681469434'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/06/when-it-comes-to-health-care-why-do.html' title='When It Comes to Health Care, Why Do Republicans (and Some Centrist Democrats) Hate Americans?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1254202256186328580</id><published>2009-06-21T10:40:00.012-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-21T12:10:59.357-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Nurse Jackie" and "HawthoRNe" Bring Nurses to the Forefront in Prime Time</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]After years of taking a back seat to doctors on medical dramas from "St. Elsewhere" to "Grey's Anatomy," nurses are finally having their moment in the sun, with the debut of "HawthoRNe" (TNT, Tuesdays at 9 p.m. Eastern) and "Nurse Jackie" (Showtime, Mondays at 10:30 Eastern).While the two programs vary </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1254202256186328580'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1254202256186328580'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/06/nurse-jackie-and-hawthorne-bring-nurses.html' title='&quot;Nurse Jackie&quot; and &quot;HawthoRNe&quot; Bring Nurses to the Forefront in Prime Time'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-8319906616860158771</id><published>2009-06-17T14:01:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-17T14:25:58.563-04:00</updated><title type='text'>One Lesson from the 1930s: Financial Regulation Has to Be Bold</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Three weeks ago I asked why so many Republicans seem to hate America. Well, today, one reason has become clear: Because some of them love banks and big corporations more than they love the American people or the American economy.President Obama revealed his plans to regulate the financial industry today,</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8319906616860158771'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8319906616860158771'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-do-republicans-love-banks-more-than.html' title='One Lesson from the 1930s: Financial Regulation Has to Be Bold'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2460859208283382224</id><published>2009-06-13T10:35:00.014-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T12:02:29.302-04:00</updated><title type='text'>E! Spins "Kendra" Off of "The Girls Next Door," But I Have No Idea Why</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]When E! announced that Kendra Wilkinson of the network's "The Girls Next Door" would be given her own spinoff, "Kendra" (new episodes air Sundays at 10 p.m. Eastern), my reaction was: Why? Believe it or not, I did watch "The Girls Next Door." I didn't TiVo it, and I certainly missed more than a few </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2460859208283382224'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2460859208283382224'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/06/girls-next-door-spins-off-kendra-but-i.html' title='E! Spins &quot;Kendra&quot; Off of &quot;The Girls Next Door,&quot; But I Have No Idea Why'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-121108545941580307</id><published>2009-06-08T13:41:00.007-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-08T15:26:30.135-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Bush Hangover: Guantanamo Undercuts Our Protests of North Korea</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]George W. Bush has been out of office for more than four months now, but I fear that the damage done during the Bush years has inflicted serious injury to the American psyche and reputation, and it will take years, if not decades, to recover.Why am I bringing this up now?I woke up this morning to the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/121108545941580307'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/121108545941580307'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/06/bush-hangover-guantanamo-undercuts-our.html' title='The Bush Hangover: Guantanamo Undercuts Our Protests of North Korea'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2088371216009434631</id><published>2009-06-05T14:04:00.011-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-05T15:35:56.400-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Two New Summer Shows: "Royal Pains" and "The Listener"</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]It's nearly summer, which means beaches, barbecues and crappy television. In the past, it was the season for reruns. But now, the broadcast networks rely mostly on lightweight reality programs to fill out their schedules. Sensing a void, in recent years basic cable outlets began jumping in with one-hour </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2088371216009434631'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2088371216009434631'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/06/royal-pains-and-listener-arrive-for.html' title='Two New Summer Shows: &quot;Royal Pains&quot; and &quot;The Listener&quot;'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1007945498811615524</id><published>2009-05-29T14:09:00.010-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-29T15:29:09.601-04:00</updated><title type='text'>My Network Upronts Recap (and I'll Be Nice to NBC, I Promise)</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Last week, the five broadcast networks held their upfront presentations in New York, revealing what their Fall 2009 schedules would look like. (You can download the grid from cynopsis.com.) It's hard to be surprised by much, since information leaks out early, and NBC no longer adheres to the upfront </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1007945498811615524'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1007945498811615524'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/05/my-network-upronts-recap-and-ill-be.html' title='My Network Upronts Recap (and I&apos;ll Be Nice to NBC, I Promise)'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-5143983141962707990</id><published>2009-05-27T14:02:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-27T17:03:18.870-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Do So Many Republicans Hate America?</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]On Sunday, as I sat watching former House speaker Newt Gingrich unabashedly endorse the politics of fear on Meet the Press, ("I think people should be afraid"),  I couldn't help wonder why so many Republicans hate America so much.Don't get me wrong. I know Republicans think they love America. They talk a</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5143983141962707990'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5143983141962707990'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/05/why-do-so-many-republicans-hate-america.html' title='Why Do So Many Republicans Hate America?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-4624346457730834140</id><published>2009-05-22T14:02:00.010-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-22T14:45:14.085-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Glee" Is Worthy of Fox's Interesting Publicity Stunt</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Fox finished the 2008-2009 season as the highest-rated network in the key 18-49 demographic, and in second position in total viewers. But if you scratch the surface a bit, you see the big hits that drove Fox's success are all getting long in the tooth. The network's biggest success, "American Idol," is </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4624346457730834140'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4624346457730834140'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/05/glee-is-worthy-of-foxs-interesting.html' title='&quot;Glee&quot; Is Worthy of Fox&apos;s Interesting Publicity Stunt'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7967264586357457837</id><published>2009-05-15T14:07:00.011-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-17T10:32:34.201-04:00</updated><title type='text'>NBC Offering Some Promising Shows Next Season</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]If you believe what you read, "My Name Is Earl" may not make it onto next year's schedule. NBC has indicated it will be producing a prime-time version of the "Weekend Update" segment of "Saturday Night Live," and with "Earl," completing its fourth season this week, older and more expensive, there is </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7967264586357457837'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7967264586357457837'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/05/nbc-offering-some-promising-shows-next.html' title='NBC Offering Some Promising Shows Next Season'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2811703381156358661</id><published>2009-05-11T14:06:00.018-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-11T15:25:32.181-04:00</updated><title type='text'>In Choosing Souter's Replacement, Obama Should Follow the Lead of ... George W. Bush?</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]If someone asked me what was the single most important thing I learned in law school, it would take me all of a nanosecond to answer: U.S. Supreme Court justices are far more powerful in shaping American society than the average person realizes. As these officials are appointed and not elected, and serve</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2811703381156358661'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2811703381156358661'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-choosing-souters-replacement-obama.html' title='In Choosing Souter&apos;s Replacement, Obama Should Follow the Lead of ... George W. Bush?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1364018625016274376</id><published>2009-05-07T09:57:00.008-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-07T11:21:54.017-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Networks Vie for "Christine," But I Honestly Don't Know Why</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Yesterday I read a small item that grabbed my attention: "The New Adventures of Old Christine" (CBS, Wednesdays at 8:00 p.m. Eastern) will be back for it's fifth season next year, since the show's production company has cut a "back-up" deal that will place the sitcom on ABC if CBS decides not to pick it </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1364018625016274376'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1364018625016274376'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/05/networks-vie-for-christine-but-i.html' title='Networks Vie for &quot;Christine,&quot; But I Honestly Don&apos;t Know Why'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7428615389378664156</id><published>2009-05-01T14:02:00.007-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-01T15:19:20.671-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Southland" Is Worthy of the "ER" Time Slot</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]"Southland" (Thursdays at 10 p.m. Eastern) is a sprawling, dark cop show that throws you, verite style, into the day-to-day lives of a handful of Los Angeles police officers and detectives. It features a large cast and eschews simple crime-resolution plot lines in favor of character development and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7428615389378664156'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7428615389378664156'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/05/southland-is-worthy-of-er-time-slot.html' title='&quot;Southland&quot; Is Worthy of the &quot;ER&quot; Time Slot'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-4502948291297765746</id><published>2009-04-28T09:20:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-28T09:40:15.622-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama's First 100 Days: Restoring the Good Name of the U.S.</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]The media's obsession with grading Barack Obama's first 100 days in office amuses me. Sure, in calmer times, maybe it was reasonable to look at a new administration after a little more than three months and try and figure out what kind of presidency the country was in for. But even George W. Bush waited </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4502948291297765746'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4502948291297765746'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/04/obamas-first-100-days-restoring-good.html' title='Obama&apos;s First 100 Days: Restoring the Good Name of the U.S.'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-8456690657928073638</id><published>2009-04-18T20:07:00.016-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T20:54:13.649-04:00</updated><title type='text'>New Sitcoms Reflect the Philosophies of Their Networks: "Parks and Recreation" and "Surviving Suburbia"</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]I've been hard on NBC in the past, but it's certainly justified. The network, once known for its massively successful Must See TV lineup on Thursday nights, is now essentially out of ideas. In the last few years it has repeatedly rolled out new shows, many of which were cheap copies of existing hits, that</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8456690657928073638'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8456690657928073638'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/04/new-sitcoms-reflect-philosophies-of.html' title='New Sitcoms Reflect the Philosophies of Their Networks: &quot;Parks and Recreation&quot; and &quot;Surviving Suburbia&quot;'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7439782051715533542</id><published>2009-04-15T14:01:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T15:05:57.251-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The "Teabag" Protests Smack of Neo-McCarthyism</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Today's "teabag" protests would be funny, if they didn't make me think of Sen. Joseph McCarthy, and what he might have accomplished if Fox News existed during his time.On February 9, 1950, McCarthy, a Republican from Wisconsin, said to the Women's Republican Club of Wheeling, West Virginia, "While I </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7439782051715533542'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7439782051715533542'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/04/teabag-protests-smack-of-neo.html' title='The &quot;Teabag&quot; Protests Smack of Neo-McCarthyism'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6702309787624677618</id><published>2009-04-01T14:15:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-01T15:58:01.431-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Revived "Cupid" Deserves a Better Fate than the One Met by the Original</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Considering that "Cupid" (ABC, Tuesday nights at 10:00 p.m. Eastern) earned the top spot in my spring list of new shows I was most looking forward to seeing, the expectation bar was set pretty high as I sat down to watch the pilot.The list of pluses I saw with the program before actually watching it was </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6702309787624677618'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6702309787624677618'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/04/revived-cupid-deserves-better-fate-than.html' title='The Revived &quot;Cupid&quot; Deserves a Better Fate than the One Met by the Original'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-8452188424840127775</id><published>2009-03-31T21:35:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-31T21:42:49.653-04:00</updated><title type='text'>One Man's Car Shows Why Aid to the Automakers Must Include a Commitment to Fuel Efficiency</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]When I read that President Obama was taking a hard line with General Motors and Chrysler, I immediately thought of Daniel Glass.A professional drummer and drum historian (and, in the interest of full disclosure, a fellow resident of Scheffres Hall at Brandeis University during our sophomore year of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8452188424840127775'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/8452188424840127775'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/03/one-mans-car-shows-why-aid-to.html' title='One Man&apos;s Car Shows Why Aid to the Automakers Must Include a Commitment to Fuel Efficiency'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-4392826442661682715</id><published>2009-03-27T17:34:00.009-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-27T20:19:59.499-04:00</updated><title type='text'>ABC Nurtures Another Solid Comedy With "In the Motherhood"</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]I often complain about the slow death of network sitcoms. But ABC seems to be drifting, ever so slowly, into the comedy abyss. First it brought "Scrubs" over from NBC and paired it with the quirky "Better Off Ted." And now it has come up with a companion to its fairly successful sophomore sitcom "Samantha</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4392826442661682715'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4392826442661682715'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/03/abc-nurtures-another-solid-comedy-with.html' title='ABC Nurtures Another Solid Comedy With &quot;In the Motherhood&quot;'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-9010070367725409183</id><published>2009-03-26T09:27:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-26T11:47:30.346-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Why I Have No Sympathy for Jake DeSantis</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]On Tuesday the New York Times ran on its op-ed page the resignation letter written by Jake DeSantis, a vice president of A.I.G.'s infamous financial products division. DeSantis essentially argues that he had nothing to do with the credit default swaps that nearly brought down the company (and the world </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/9010070367725409183'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/9010070367725409183'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-i-have-no-sympathy-for-jake.html' title='Why I Have No Sympathy for Jake DeSantis'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6343944817428377850</id><published>2009-03-20T14:02:00.008-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-20T14:52:39.646-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Better Off Ted" Is Out There ... Far Out There ... But Worth the Journey</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]You have to hand it to ABC executives: They clearly want to push the envelope with their programs. Not only did the network pick up the beloved but perpetually ratings-challenged "Scrubs," but it is now following it with a new single-camera comedy, "Better Off Ted" (Wednesdays at 8:30 p.m. Eastern), that </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6343944817428377850'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6343944817428377850'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/03/better-off-ted-is-out-there-far-out.html' title='&quot;Better Off Ted&quot; Is Out There ... Far Out There ... But Worth the Journey'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-3417318059267652706</id><published>2009-03-16T14:06:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-16T14:27:35.936-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Obama Was Smart to Come Out Strongly Against the A.I.G. Bonuses</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Earlier this month, New York Times op-ed columnist Thomas L. Friedman took some heat for writing that he feared the Obama presidency would be "eaten" by the problem of dealing with the banking system.Less than two weeks later, the White House has had to move quickly to keep Friedman's prophecy from </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3417318059267652706'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3417318059267652706'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-obama-was-smart-to-come-out.html' title='Why Obama Was Smart to Come Out Strongly Against the A.I.G. Bonuses'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-376365743766616208</id><published>2009-03-13T14:11:00.007-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-13T16:23:09.467-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Castle" Won't Challenge for Any TV Thrones</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]It's not hard to see what ABC is trying to do with its new show "Castle" (Mondays at 10 p.m. Eastern). From "Remington Steele" to "Moonlighting" to "The X Files" to "Bones," the idea of a mismatched guy-gal team solving crimes has been a go-to concept for the networks. So the pairing of crime novelist </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/376365743766616208'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/376365743766616208'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/03/castle-wont-challenge-for-any-tv.html' title='&quot;Castle&quot; Won&apos;t Challenge for Any TV Thrones'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-3297665446504498289</id><published>2009-03-06T19:48:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-03-06T19:59:38.136-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Jimmy Fallon Takes Over for Conan O'Brien</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]As Jimmy Fallon wraps up his first week taking over Conan O'Brien's post-Jay Leno 12:35 a.m. spot on NBC, people will no doubt chime in on how he did and what his chances are for future success. Personally, while I certainly have some first impressions, I think any fair analysis of Fallon is extremely </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3297665446504498289'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/3297665446504498289'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/03/jimmy-fallon-takes-over-for-conan.html' title='Jimmy Fallon Takes Over for Conan O&apos;Brien'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6168969026829154738</id><published>2009-03-02T09:32:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2009-03-02T10:44:00.991-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Congressional Democrats Made a Big Mistake Including Earmarks in the Spending Bill</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Democrats in Congress could really use a lesson in the art of politics from President Obama.Millions of Americans turned on their computers this morning and went to Yahoo!, only to find this headline:Obama will sign spending bill despite earmarksInstead of being a positive headline about President </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6168969026829154738'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6168969026829154738'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/03/congressional-democrats-made-big.html' title='Congressional Democrats Made a Big Mistake Including Earmarks in the Spending Bill'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-4811318073784039002</id><published>2009-02-27T17:45:00.010-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-27T18:10:03.755-05:00</updated><title type='text'>New Shows for the Spring Season: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Spring is here, and that means that it's time for warmer weather, baseball and a whole bunch of new (and returning) television programs. Maybe we should call it the "Grey's Anatomy" season, since ABC aired the first episode of the hit hospital-based drama on March 27, 2005, and surely the networks will be</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4811318073784039002'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4811318073784039002'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/02/new-shows-for-spring-season-good-bad.html' title='New Shows for the Spring Season: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-1300407380370100810</id><published>2009-02-23T13:58:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-23T16:39:33.750-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Are GOP Governors Who Turn Down Stimulus Money Unpatriotic?</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]If someone questioned the patriotism of the Republican governors who have said that they will turn down portions of the federal stimulus money intended for their states, I would have a hard time arguing with them.Hey, if the Republicans can accuse the Democrats of being unpatriotic when they were in the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1300407380370100810'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/1300407380370100810'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/02/gop-governors-who-turn-down-stimulus.html' title='Are GOP Governors Who Turn Down Stimulus Money Unpatriotic?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-6295870755745519344</id><published>2009-02-20T13:58:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-20T14:49:11.008-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Is the Future Bleak for Scripted TV Programs?</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]Is scripted television dying?You might think my question is pure hyperbole, but I'm not so sure. I'm not suggesting that non-reality TV is on its death bed, but I fear it has been given a terminal diagnosis and is just fading towards an eventual demise.A number of things have made me pessimistic lately </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6295870755745519344'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/6295870755745519344'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/02/is-future-bleak-for-scripted-tv.html' title='Is the Future Bleak for Scripted TV Programs?'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-4341357020131710380</id><published>2009-02-13T13:58:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-13T14:32:21.190-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Demetri Martin's New Program Is a Bit Disappointing, But It's Much Better than "The CollegeHumor Show"</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]With a bunch of new shows set to debut next month, I thought I'd dive into the world of basic cable to check out two new comedy offerings, "Important Things With Demetri Martin" (Comedy Central, first airings Wednesdays at 10:30 p.m. Eastern) and "The CollegeHumor Show" (MTV, first airings Sundays at 9:30</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4341357020131710380'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/4341357020131710380'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/02/demetri-martins-new-show-is-not-great.html' title='Demetri Martin&apos;s New Program Is a Bit Disappointing, But It&apos;s Much Better than &quot;The CollegeHumor Show&quot;'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2174344438689244741</id><published>2009-02-09T14:10:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-09T16:08:33.970-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Republicans Say They'd Support the "Right" Stimulus Bill, But Stimulus for Them Is Only More Tax Cuts</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]There was an exchange on Meet the Press yesterday that illustrated why Republicans in Congress opposing the stimulus package are being less than forthright with the American people.David Gregory: "But you cite Japan. Critics of what Japan did during that decade was that they often, with these stimulus </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2174344438689244741'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2174344438689244741'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/02/republicans-say-theyd-support-right.html' title='Republicans Say They&apos;d Support the &quot;Right&quot; Stimulus Bill, But Stimulus for Them Is Only More Tax Cuts'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-5613851761537411166</id><published>2009-02-02T13:32:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-02T13:53:16.110-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Democrats in Congress Need to Learn How to Lead</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Of the many reasons why Americans chose Barack Obama to be president in November, unquestionably one of the biggest was his ability to lead. His vision, and his ability to impart it to the electorate, drew support. It was about more than just policies and competency and ability.Alas, since Obama has been</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5613851761537411166'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/5613851761537411166'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/02/democrats-in-congress-need-to-learn-how.html' title='Democrats in Congress Need to Learn How to Lead'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-2922753795095554434</id><published>2009-01-30T14:05:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-30T15:03:42.742-05:00</updated><title type='text'>"Trust Me" Is Not Bad, But It's No "Mad Men"</title><summary type='text'>[NOTE: The following article will also appear as my regular television column for WILDsound.]A creative director stands in a boardroom filled with nervous colleagues and skeptical clients, and using the information he's picked up about himself and the world over the last 45 minutes of television time, he improvises a brilliant, edgy, smart campaign that blows away the client and saves the day. Am</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2922753795095554434'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/2922753795095554434'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/01/trust-me-is-not-bad-but-its-no-mad-men.html' title='&quot;Trust Me&quot; Is Not Bad, But It&apos;s No &quot;Mad Men&quot;'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939236067387659721.post-7021300727679847777</id><published>2009-01-29T14:03:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-29T15:27:10.714-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Republicans in the House Are Behaving Like the Collapse of Bush's Policies Never Happened</title><summary type='text'>[This article also appears on Huffingtonpost.com. You can access it from my author page here.]Say you belonged to a charitable organization, and you and your friends were appointed to the steering committee for a big fundraiser, so you chose to have a combination bake sale and casino night. And let's say that you scheduled it on the same night as the town's homecoming football game, so nearly </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7021300727679847777'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939236067387659721/posts/default/7021300727679847777'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://anotherblogsorry.blogspot.com/2009/01/republicans-in-house-are-behaving-like.html' title='Republicans in the House Are Behaving Like the Collapse of Bush&apos;s Policies Never Happened'/><author><name>Mitchell Bard</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13461514804540959328</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
